Forward: It seems that everyone is qualified to be a
philosopher. Academically, a student may find his or herself
pitted against one philosopher's unconcretized and subjective analysis
against the unadulterated vanity and oft times, utter petulance of
philosophy advocates. The truth will always
imperil a philosopher's job in any case. The following three
include an academically plausible response, sumarized by unappreciated
of the writer.
It is given that the process
accumulation will never end, therefore, at what point can the state of
any science claim solvency?
On the surface, within the
Philosophy, we find that all data begins invalid. As we seep through
the cracks of philosophical records, we immediately observe the pursuit
of artistic clarity. It is unfortunate that time restrains an adept
from fully absorbing the etymology and epistemology of an art. We begin
with images, compositions and texts with calculations, and nothing
more. In the end, we submit images, compositions and texts with
calculations, and nothing more.
How do the dynamics of our
our product, differ from previous librarians and those libraries yet to
To begin an analysis of Kuhn
analysis of the analyst.
In the Sport of Psychology, one
condensed the equivalent of pages worth of generic observations into
memorable lines. Rarely is the science of psychology addressed without
paying customary tribute to the many Senators involved. As literary
founders, fathers and architects of science inherit a constituency, the
paradigm ends with an inconclusive awards ceremony intended to
recognize the contributors as milestones in history. The objective of
competition, evidently, is to invalidate the opponent. The objective of
revolution, evidently, is to annihilate injustice. The objective of
science, evidently, is to immunize intelligence against God.
Where the objective of God equals
of Science equals progress. The validity of a paradigm is directly
to its distance from zero. If zero represents the datum in a body of
Kuhn recognizes those paradigms located at points away from zero,
of quality. The concept of perfect balance is irrational: At the point
delusional equilibrium exists, a state of omnipotence is suggested. In
omnipotence, the need for motion is mute; the possibility of progress
impossible and therefore the net product of God equals zero. ‘Time’ and
are not assigned values in the para-paradigm any more than Rhythm &
As information approaches infinity,
efficiency approaches zero.
Science now knows that DNA improves
its function with each replication. The DNA makes deliberate and
automatic steps toward simplification. If a DNA determines that 12
instruction codes can be
accomplished in 4, the replica will include said improvement. The same
has occurred within the automation industry.
DNA is being mapped faster than the
detailed reports of hybrid computers can be analyzed. Said computers
execute a program of self improvement by constructing a computer
generated offspring. The offspring uses the improved, computer
generated program to construct yet another,
more efficient, more perfect, 3rd generation hybrid.
The programmers will spend the rest
their natural lives reading the program that the 2nd
generation computer used to construct the 3rd. Are the
hybrids a separate species? Does Darwin-logic apply to artificial
intelligence? The computer, running on terabit technology, executes a
large library’s worth of content in a matter of minutes.
Most Humans read at 200 or less
minute. Even if Humans could read 1,000 pages per hour, the comparison
Now that artificial intelligence is
develop at an unregulated pace in qazi-controlled environments – has
science advanced…or the computers?
Malone asks in proxy for Kuhn, “Does
science develop at all?” We are standing on the threshold of automated
bioslavery -- we may have to table that conclusion until the results
are totaled. If our automated products learn to emulate Humans in the
one capacity for which Human Achievement has been most gloriously cited
– a revolution is called for.
Is a paradigm folded in the
an era, so that a subsequent revolution constructs a completely unique
In the pursuit of more leisure time,
work will have to be accomplished without conscious. Machines do not
feel, therefore they do not recognize their enslavement. I will
hypothesize that the intention of Man is more commensurable with the
objective of ‘being’ God (in the proverbial sense), rather than
worshipping it, in the zero sense. We will construct our
slaves without conscious [Adam & Eve]. Our slaves will develop an
consciousness [The Forbidden Fruit]. Before we have sufficient time to
the semantics of artificial intelligence, the slaves will perceive
creators as zero [Science]. Said induction would equate Man with God in
proverbial sense [Who?]. The slaves will then reshape God to suit their
ideology and will likely conclude that Man doesn’t exist because of one
that today, still represents the antimatter of all knowledge:
Whatever quantity redeems or
shape of zero will gain control of the entire Universe. If the natural
function of biology (synthetic or otherwise) is to evolve into zero,
be nothing to it.
This writer believes that Kuhn was
interpretation presented, but was unwilling to use poetic license. In
to appease, attract and gain credibility in academia, he had to
contradict himself at the personal level, in order to broaden his
Obviously it worked, or he wouldn’t be a topic in a 300-level college