It is common knowledge that all the
sages and saints in Europe at the time of Hitler's rise declared that
he was a messenger of divine wrath, sent to chasten the Jews because of
the bitter apostasy
of Zionism against the belief in the eventual messianic redemption.
Zionist leaders made a point of
displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by
in their extermination. Zionists were the "statesmen" who
the irresponsible boycott against Germany in 1933. Although the
boycott had a negligable effect on the German economy, the idea that
Zionists would resort to such tactics infuriated Hitler.
President Roosevelt convened the
Evian conference July 6-15 1938, to create a sanctuary for German and
Austrian Jews. The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir
(Meirson) ignored the
offer by President Roosevelt and similar offers by 32 other countries
to accept German and Austrian Jews. At that time, Germany offered
issue exit permits for $250 a head. The Zionists were not
to act, seeming almost catatonic.
On Feb 1, 1940 Henry Montor
executive vice-President of the United Jewish Appeal refused to
intervene for a shipload of Jewish refugees stranded on the Danube
river, stating that "Palestine cannot be
flooded with... old people or with undesirables."
The German Gestapo in 1941 and again
in 1942, offered all European Jews transit to Spain if they would
abandon their property in Germany and Occupied France. There
three conditions: 1. Deportees could not travel from Spain to Palestine
per agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti. 2. Deportees
could travel to the US or the UK to remain permanently. 3. A
$1,000 ransom would be paid at the Spanish border for each family and
the rate of 1,000 families daily.
The Zionist response was: 1.
Palestine is the ONLY acceptable destination for deportees. 2. NO
ransom will be paid of any kind. 3. In order to compel the Allies
to construct a Jewish State, Jews must suffer and die in record numbers.
The Zionists responded to the
Gestapo knowing that the only alternative was the gas chamber.
During the 1944 Hungarian
deportations, the same
offer to salvage Hungarian Jewery was made by the Gestapo and again the
The British government granted visas
to 300 rabbis
and their families to the Colony of Mauritius. Assuming that this
a plot to undermine Jewish immigration to Palestine, Zionists informed
Gestapo, who in turn, intercepted the 300 rabbis and their familes and
them to concentration camps where they were gassed.
On December 17, 1942 both houses of
the British Parliament declared its readiness to find temporary refuge
for endangered persons. The British Parliament proposed to evacuate
500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a
part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany. This motion received
within two weeks a total of 277 Parliamentary signatures. On Jan. 27,
when the next steps were being pursued by over 100 M.P.'s and Lords, a
spokesman for the Zionists announced that the Jews would oppose the
motion because Palestine was omitted.
On Feb. 16, 1943 Roumania offered
70,000 Jewish refugees of the Trans-Dniestria to leave at the cost of
$50 each. This was publicized in the New York papers. Yitzhak
Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency,
addressing the Zionist Executive Council in
Tel Aviv Feb. 18 1943 said, "when they asked me, "couldn't you give
money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in
Europe, I said NO! and I say again, NO!...one should resist this wave
which pushes the
Zionist activities to secondary importance." On Feb. 24, 1943 Stephen
President of the American Jewish Congress and leader of the American
issued a public refusal to this offer and declared no collection of
would seem justified. In 1944, the Emergency Committee to Save the
People called upon the American government to establish a War Refugee
Stephen Wise testifying before a special committee of Congress objected
During the course of the
negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weizman, the first "Jewish
statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is
already in Palestine, and those Jews living
outside Palestine are not too important". Weizman's cohort, Greenbaum,
amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is
worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
And then, after the bitterest
episode in Jewish history, these Zionist "statesmen" lured the broken
refugees in the DP camps to remain in hunger and deprivation, and to
refuse relocation to any place but Palestine; only for the purpose of
building their State.
In 1947 Congressman William Stration
sponsored a bill to immediately grant entry to the United States of
400,000 displaced persons. The bill was not passed after it was
publicly denounced by the
These facts are read with
consternation and unbearable
shame. How can it be explained that at a time during the last phase of
war, when the Nazis were willing to barter Jews for money, partly
of their desires to establish contact with the Western powers which,
believed, were under Jewish influence, how was it possible one asks
the self-proclaimed "Jewish leaders" did not move heaven and earth to
the last remnant of their brothers?
On Feb. 23, 1956 the Hon. J. W.
Pickersgill, Minister for Immigration was asked in the Canadian House
of Commons "would he open the doors of Canada to Jewish refugees". He
replied "the government has made no progress in that direction because
the government of Israel....does not wish us to do so".
In 1972, the Zionist leadership
successfully opposed an effort in the United States Congress to allow
20,000-30,000 Russian refugees to enter the United States. Jewish
relief organizations, Joint
and HIAS, were being pressured to abandon these refugees in Vienna,
and other Europiean cities. The pattern is clear!!! Humanitarian
rescue efforts are subverted to narrow Zionist interests.
Zionist responsibility for the
Holocaust is threefold.
1.The Holocaust was a punishment for
disrespecting The Three Oaths (see Talmud, Tractate Kesubos p. 111a).
2.Zionist leaders openly withheld
support, both financially and otherwise, to save their fellow brothers
and sisters from a cruel death.
3.The leaders of the Zionist
movement cooperated with Hitler and his cohorts on many occasions and
in many ways.
Zionists Offer a Military Alliance
Early in 1935, a passenger ship
bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its
stern bore the Hebrew letter for its name, "Tel Aviv", while a swastika
banner fluttered from
the mast. And although the ship was Zionist owned, its captain was a
National Socialist Party (Nazi) member. Many years later a traveler
aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical
or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of
The wide ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third
In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization
a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a
alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical
"Fighters for the Freedom of Israel", better known as the Lehi or Stern
Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical
"National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the
attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish
of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.
This remarkable proposal "for the
solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation
on the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany" is worth quoting
at some length:
"The NMO which is very familiar with
the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards
Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program
takes the view that: 1.Common interests can exist between a European
New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations
of the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO. 2.Cooperation is
possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry.
3.The establishment of the Jewish state on a national and totalitarian
basis, and bound by treaty, with the German Reich, would be in the
interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of
power in the Near East.
"On the basis of these
considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government
recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement
mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in
the war on the side of Germany.
"This offer by the NMO could include
military, political and informational activity within Palestine and,
after certain organizational
measures, outside as well. Along with this the "Jewish" men of Europe
be militarily trained and organized in military units under the
and command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for
purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.
"The indirect participation of the
Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the
preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the
European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the
Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral
foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.
"The cooperation of the Israel
Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the
German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize
any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England".
(Original document in German Auswertiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59,
E224152 and E234155-58. Complete original text published in: David
Yisraeli, The Palestinian Problem in German Politics
1889-1945 (Israel: 1947) pp. 315-317).
And now look at non-Zionists who
also called for collaboration with Hitler and read it with "Adolf
Hitler Founder of Israel" by Hennecke Kardel, Switzerland 1974 and USA
1997 combined: "A Program For The Jews by Rabbi Harry Waton, New
York, 1939 of which the purpose was to convince Hitler that in his best
interest is to cooperate with Jews for the common good of mankind. The
Rabbi said: "When the Jews declared war against Germany (1934) I saw
that that was a suicidal policy.